For several years now, private social and environmental action groups have been cautioning against the common practice of adding fluoride to drinking water. Fluoridation was first established in the United States in the mid 1940s after initial studies indicated less prominence of tooth decay issues in children in areas where natural fluoride levels in ground water were relatively high. While the arguments for and against fluoridation continue, there is growing support that the process may do harm than good.
According to the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, the addition of fluoride to drinking water helps prevent tooth decay and strengthens the enamel of teeth for children and adults. The long held belief among western authorities that fluoride in water is good for the general public has lead to fluoridation becoming a common practice in many city and other public water supplies around the globe. In recent years however, there is growing evidence that fluoridation may have some very serious health consequences, particularly for children.
In one study, conducted and published by the American Dental Association in 2010, fluoride was linked to an increased incidence of tooth decay in infants and children rather than a decrease. Namely, children exposed to fluoride consistently from birth to age four frequently develop dental fluorosis, a condition in which the children?s developing teeth fail to mineralize properly and rot from the inside out as a result. The same process can affect developing bones as well, causing them to lack the appropriate minerals for forming and growing properly.
In addition to these findings, several recent studies of Indian and Chinese children who drank well water and municipal water which contained high levels of fluoride have shown intellectual deficits as a potential side effect of fluoridation. Children in these studies did not perform as well in IQ and other intellectual and cognitive measurements tests as did children in areas where fluoridation is not employed.
While some argue further study is required to determine if total fluoride consumption poses a substantial health risk to children in the United States and other areas in which fluoridation is common practice, many believe the documentation available is enough to warrant changes in policies and personal practices in the home.
Those who believe further study is warranted before public policy changes are implemented point out that other factors, including environmental, dietary and genetic issues may play a role in the results of recent studies. Still other members of the general public believe the practice of fluoridation is simply not worth the potential risks, especially where the health and well being of their children are concerned. For this reason, many consumers decide to install home water filters and whole house water filtration systems capable of removing fluoride from their tap water.
Although there are many varieties of commercial water filters now available on the market, not all measure up the same when trying to remove fluoride from drinking water. The most effective filters for defluoridation are those that use reverse osmosis and ionization technologies, and multi-stage filtration is best for the health conscious parent who wishes to address other water contamination concerns as well.
You can remove the fluoride from your drinking water with a fluoride filter from PureWaterHQ: Authorized Dealer: CRYSTAL QUEST? Water Filters
Source: http://toddsblogs.com/healthandfitness/2012/06/30/the-dangers-of-fluoride-in-drinking-water/
demi moore hospitalized james farentino somali pirates navy seals navy seal team 6 tim gunn tim gunn
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.